Enhancing Dialogic Argumentation in Mathematics and Science

نویسندگان
چکیده

منابع مشابه

Middle school science students’ dialogic argumentation

Argumentation schemes for presumptive reasoning are used to analyze students’ small group discourse during the evaluation of a science investigation project. Seventeen triads of middle school students participated in a structured 45-60 minute long interview. The broad set argumentation schemes employed by students, such as argument from sign and argument from consequences, suggests that the aut...

متن کامل

Representing dialogic argumentation

Dialogic argumentation is a crucial component in many computational domains, and forms a core component of argumentation theory. This paper compares two approaches to dialogue that have grown from two different disciplines; the descriptive–normative approach of applied philosophy, and the formal, implemented approach of computer science. The commonalities between the approaches are explored in ...

متن کامل

Mathematics and Argumentation

Some authors have begun to appeal directly to studies of argumentation in their analyses of mathematical practice. These include researchers from an impressively diverse range of disciplines: not only philosophy of mathematics and argumentation theory, but also psychology, education, and computer science. This introduction provides some background to

متن کامل

Enhancing Science and Mathematics Education with Computational Modelling

The development of knowledge in science and mathematics involves modelling processes where theory, experiment and computation are dynamically interconnected. For education in these fields to be in contact with their rapid progress and closer to the nature of research, it is crucial that both curricula and learning environments from high school to university manifest effectively a balanced inter...

متن کامل

Analytic Frameworks for Assessing Dialogic Argumentation in Online Learning Environments

Over the last decade, researchers have developed sophisticated online learning environments to support students engaging in argumentation. This review first considers the range of functionalities incorporated within these online environments. The review then presents five categories of analytic frameworks focusing on (1) formal argumentation structure, (2) normative quality, (3) nature and func...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Studia paedagogica

سال: 2017

ISSN: 1803-7437,2336-4521

DOI: 10.5817/sp2017-4-4